Robert Kuan

Robert Kuan
  • PhD Candidate

Contact Information

  • office Address:

    3730 Walnut Street
    527.4 Jon M Huntsman Hall
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

Overview

My research examines how choice architecture shapes goal pursuit and self-control. In my work, I draw on theories of consumer behavior, psychology, behavioral economics, and judgment and decision-making. I explore how the suggestions consumers receive, and the labels they attach to their mental accounts, influence whether they ultimately follow through on their goals.

I investigate these questions primarily through large-scale field studies, and I’ve worked with numerous organizational partners, including the U.S. Department of Education and CVS Pharmacy.

I received my Bachelor of Science in Economics from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 2011.

For more up-to-date information on my research, please visit my personal website: robkuan.com

Continue Reading

Research

  • Rob Kuan, Kristin Blagg, Benjamin Castleman, Rajeev Darolia, Jordan Matsudaira, Katherine L. Milkman, Lesley Turner (2025), Behavioral Nudges Prevent Loan Delinquencies at Scale: A 13-Million Person Field Experiment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416708122

    Abstract: Americans collectively hold over $1.6 trillion in student loan debt, and over the last decade millions of borrowers have defaulted on loans, with serious consequences for their financial health. In a 13-million-person field experiment with the U.S. Department of Education, we tested the effectiveness of different email interventions to inform borrowers about alternative repayment options after a missed loan payment. Our interventions tested whether sending monthly behaviorally-informed emails, providing follow-up reminders, framing benefits in percentage (vs. dollar) terms, and providing just one recommended action step at a time (vs. two) affected borrower outcomes. We find that i) behaviorally-informed emails reduce estimated 60-d delinquencies by 0.42 pp, ii) reminders boost the efficacy of such emails by 0.57 pp, iii) describing potential savings in percentage terms is more effective than describing these benefits in dollar terms, reducing estimated delinquencies by 0.14 pp, and iv) encouraging two actions (i.e., enrollment in income-driven repayment plans and auto debit programs) repeatedly across two emails is marginally more effective than encouraging one action at-a-time across two emails, reducing estimated delinquencies by 0.05 pp. Overall, if scaled to all 13-million borrowers in our experiment, we estimate that our best-performing intervention would have averted approximately 79,800 60-d delinquencies. Our findings i) highlight the benefits of describing potential savings in percentage terms, which may magnify perceived savings for recipients, ii) underscore the risks of oversimplification, and iii) demonstrate that nudges can be an effective, low-cost complement to other policies for reducing delinquencies and supporting borrowers with student loan debt.

Activity

Latest Research

Rob Kuan, Kristin Blagg, Benjamin Castleman, Rajeev Darolia, Jordan Matsudaira, Katherine L. Milkman, Lesley Turner (2025), Behavioral Nudges Prevent Loan Delinquencies at Scale: A 13-Million Person Field Experiment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416708122
All Research